Very. Tired.
Monday, August 6, 2012
Friday, August 3, 2012
Poseidon Concepts
It’s almost that time again.
Yep, you got it. Poseidon (PSN on TSX) will be releasing Q2 results on August 8. PSN has been a very interesting stock to
track, primarily because of the explosive growth they have recorded so far during
their short history. The explosive
growth and short history are also what make it hard to put a value on PSN. Here’s an interesting blog providing some
good background and analysis on PSN written in the early days (it was written 2
quarters ago). With all the new information
that is now available, I thought I’d take a stab at forecasting PSN’s results
ahead of their release date.
Key historical information
Q1
2012
|
Q4
2011
|
%
Change
|
|
Average tanks
Revenue
Qtly revenue
Qtly revenue per tank
Annualized revenue per tank
Operating Costs
Qtly operating costs
Qtly operating costs per tank
Annualized operating costs per tank
General and Admin
|
290
52,129
180
719
4,709
16
65
3,717
|
205
33,824
165
660
3,277
16
64
2,128
|
+41%
+54%
+9%
+9%
44%
2%
2%
75%
|
EBITDA
|
43,703
|
28,419
|
54%
|
- Using historical quarterly information, we can derive revenue per tank and operating costs per tank.
- Revenue per tank has increased substantially in Q1 2012. In their Q1 2011 release, management mentioned improved tank utilization.
- General and admin expenses have increased substantially (up 75%). Based on the Q1 release, it sounds like they have been on a hiring binge, to meet growing business demand. Hopefully this is good news, and hopefully management will stick to their guns when claiming to be a “rental business with relatively low fixed costs” with a “longer-term goal to be a dividend growth company”.
- G&A will be a tough variable to pin down, especially if Q1 is not fully reflecting all of the anticipated ramp up in costs. To be conservative, I will us $20M for the year ($5M per quarter).
Cost of a tank
- One of the big questions is how much it costs to build a tank. It looks like this is in the $150k to $200k range. If this is true, given that quarterly revenue per tank is $180, PSN breaks even on each tank after one quarter!
- Three ways to verify the $150k-$200k estimate:
- PSN added $13,361 to PPE during Q1 2012. They built 100 tanks during this period, which implies a cost of $134k (most of the PPE balance is represented by tanks)
- The total gross balance of PPE at the end of Q1 2012 is $49,118. At period end, total tanks were 340, implying a cost of $144k.
- Depreciation in Q1 2012 was $1.1M. With 290 average tanks in the quarter, the implied cost using PSN’s 10 year amortization policy results in a $150k cost per tank. A similar calculation for Q4 2011 results in $180k cost per tank.
Debt
- The only debt remaining on the books is a $10M note payable to the parent company (due on November 1, 2012), with interest of prime + 1%. I will assume 4.5% interest.
- Each quarter since spinning off, the company has slowly shifted its capital weighting from debt to share capital.
Average Tanks
- PSN produces 7 tanks per week. Assuming 50 work weeks, this will add 350 tanks by the end of 2012, or 175 on average for the year (350/2).
- Add this amount to the number of tanks PSN had at the beginning of the year (240) gives us 415 average earning tanks over the course of the year.
Forecast Scenarios
- With such big margins, it’s difficult to say if management can maintain them, especially if there are new entrants competing in this space. I’ve added 4 potential scenarios. For simplicity, these variables have been applied throughout the entire 2012 year even though we have 1 quarter of actual results.
S1: Assumes revenue
per tank and operating cost per tank is consistent with Q1 results
S2: Assumes a 10%
increase in operating costs per tank
S3: Assumes a 10%
decrease in revenue per tank
S4: Assumes both S2
and S3 occur
- Going forward into 2013, as competition grows, tank utilization (ie. the proportion of tanks that are rented out) will play a bigger role in forecasting PSN. However, for the foreseeable future, I think it’s safe to assume that tank utilization will be similar or better than previous quarters.
S1
|
S2
|
S3
|
S4
|
|
Average tanks
Revenue per tank
Total revenue
Operating cost per tank
Total operating cost
General and admin
EBITDA
Interest @ 4.5%
Depreciation
Stock Comp
Tax @ 26%
Net income after tax
Dividends ($1.08 x 28M)
Retained Earnings
Payout ratio
Earnings/share (81M shares)
Price/Earnings ($14 price)
|
415
719
298,394
65
26,955
20,000
251,439
375
6,225
7,200
61,786
175,853
87,480
88,373
50%
2.17
6.45
|
415
719
298,394
71
29,650
20,000
248,743
375
6,225
7,200
61,085
173,858
87,480
86,378
50%
2.14
6.53
|
415
647
268,554
65
26,955
20,000
221,599
375
6,225
7,200
54,028
153,771
87,480
66,291
57%
1.90
7.38
|
415
647
268,554
71
29,650
20,000
218,904
375
6,225
7,200
53,327
151,777
87,480
64,297
58%
1.87
7.48
|
Profitability does seem a bit too good to be true, even though conservative assumptions were used. The last PSN EBITDA forecast for 2012 was $210M, which was revised
upwards from $170M from previous guidance (also up from the $130M original
guidance). The above numbers are higher
than PSN’s latest forecast, however PSN has developed a track record of providing conservative estimates.
This forecast may help rationalize the high dividend (currently ~8%). In Q1 2012, after paying dividends, the company retained only $8.9M to reinvest in operations.
Based on the above, by the end of the year, the company will have
retained $65M+ in the company. This may also help rationalize a growing dividend in coming years.
The P/E above using current market price (~$14) could
be considered high, depending on when you believe revenues/utilization will start to be impacted by competition. Mitigating this is
the high dividend yield and the prospect of accelerated NIAT growth in coming
years.
In addition to the risks identified in Potato's blog, I’ll add
a few more:
- Collections – PSN has been slow in collecting from its customers, and this has gotten worse in Q1 2012 compared to Q4 2011. Whats the hold up?! It's not clear why it takes 2 quarters for PSN to collect from customers (could be the way they are recognizing revenue, or maybe this is how the business works).
- G&A spend has been growing fast. It will be interesting to see if this plateaus over the next 2 quarters.
- As competition grows, revenue per tank will be under pressure. However, at this point, it seems like there is still room in the market for PSN and any new potential entrants.
Based on Scenario 1 assumptions, here’s my Q2 forecast
estimate:
Revenue
Operating Costs |
61,680
6,490 |
General and Admin
|
5,000
|
EBITDA
|
50,190
|
Interest Expense
|
113
|
Depreciation
|
1,446
|
Stock Based Comp
|
1,800
|
Tax
|
12,176
|
NIAT
|
34,656
|
Disclosure: I am not an investment advisor. I am long PSN (with a very minor investment). I am more interested in seeing how the company will perform, given the volatility in the stock price and uncertainty in the company's results.
Tuesday, July 31, 2012
Cutting the cord
Want to cut your TV bill? Looking for a home theatre PC (HTPC) to add to your living
room? As you may know, most of the major
television stations publish their shows for free online and also in HD over the
air (OTA) for free! Invest in a computer to view this free content
on your television.
Value
|
Regular
|
Superior 3D
|
Intel Celeron
2.4Ghz Dual Core
2GB RAM
BYOHD – Bring your own hard drive
|
Intel Pentium
2.6Ghz Dual Core
2GB RAM
BYOHD – Bring your
own hard drive
|
Coming soon...
|
$350
|
$380
|
This HTPC computer is compact, sleek and packed with enough
horsepower to view high definition streams and movie files. Windows7 is already equipped with a family
friendly way of viewing your content. The
computer measures 5.1" x 8.7" x 11.8", runs at a cool 40 degrees
celsius, is whisper quiet, and uses only 40 watts when powered on. It fits perfectly on your TV stand!
Customizations:
- +$120 add a 1.5TB hard drive for media storage
- +$120 add Windows 7 Home Premium
- +$270 add both (1) and (2), plus configuration of system
- +$100 add configuration of system (bring your own HDD and Win7)
- +$140 add dual TV tuner for watching HD feed from antenna
- +$140 add Blu-Ray disc reader
- Coming soon... Over the Air Antenna Installation
Looking for a cheaper option?
Give nettop PC’s a try or the Apple TV 2. You can probably find one for $250 to $300, plus tax. These are good affordable options
and are generally good for viewing most files. However they lack
versatility. Most nettop PC’s are based
off of the Intel Atom processor and the Nvidia Ion graphics processor, which
has had very poor reviews, especially for Flash and Netflix video. If you can get your hands on the Apple TV 2,
it can be jailbroken with XBMC on it.
However, web browsing is not an option yet and there is very little hard
drive space to store media. It’s also
unfortunate that the Apple TV 2 is no longer sold in stores, and the Apple TV 3
has not been jail broken yet.
|
Apple A4
1Ghz Single Core
256MB RAM
8GB Storage
|
Intel Atom
1.8Ghz Dual Core
2GB RAM
320GB Storage
|
$250 to $300, plus tax
|
|
The case for... switching Internet providers
Oh, Rogers . I'm impressed at how you have grown to
become a Mammoth Money Making Monster (MMMM), leaving your victims with no choice but to
choose you (or choose your MLSE partner in crime, Bell ).
But alas, we have a new hero (well not really new but just play along with me
here) among us. A choice for the
puny retail consumer. A Dark Knight. (cue in dramatic music...)
So you can tell I am a bit overly pumped about the Dark
Knight Rises. I am also just as
passionate about competitive pricing from our telecom overlords. So, for my first real blog since 2006, I
wanted to start with an easy one - the case for saving money on Internet.
What I know about Teksavvy is that they have really cheese
ads with Georges Laraque posing as their superhero (personally I would've chosen
Christian Bale, but really who am I - nobody). I also understand that Teksavvy utilizes the Rogers infrastructure, so
if you go with Teksavvy, you are really using Rogers ' systems. I'm sure I could add some sort of symbolism
here, but I won't (such as "Luke, I am your
father!").
Comparison ($'s exclude taxes): Teksavvy vs. Rogers
Thankfully, these companies have made their internet packages quite easy to compare. Here is a comparison of the first tier of internet packages offered by both companies:
Comparison ($'s exclude taxes): Teksavvy vs. Rogers
Thankfully, these companies have made their internet packages quite easy to compare. Here is a comparison of the first tier of internet packages offered by both companies:
As you will quickly notice, you get more for your dollar if you go with Teksavvy. Rogers customers often move up to a more expensive package because the 15GB allowance is not enough. These customers don't necessarily move up to the next package because they need faster download/upload speeds, which is what they are paying for with the next step up. The next package from Rogers is $48.99 per month, and gives you only 80GB of bandwidth! With Teksavvy's Lite Cable 3 package, you can get 300GB for $30.95 per month. Out of all the ones offered by both companies, this package wins in my books - I get more than enough bandwidth and the speeds are fast enough for my requirements. One day, if I ever start a server, I may consider looking at moving to a higher upload speed.
Additional Details ($'s exclude taxes)
Additional Details ($'s exclude taxes)
- Bandwidth overage calculations: Each month, Rogers will calculate your bandwidth usage, and will add an additional usage charge to your bill for each GB over your limit (the charge ranges from $0.5 per GB to $4 per GB depending on the internet package you chose). Teksavvy calculates your overage based on a 2 month rolling average. This would be helpful on those months when you download an inordinate amount of cartoons. +1 for Teksavvy.
- One-time Activation Fee + Modem Purchase: Under both Rogers or Teksavvy, you will need a modem (rent or buy). The cost of activation + modem purchase from Teksavvy is $130, and from Rogers is $214.90 (difference of $84.90!!). +1 for Teksavvy.
- So some people might say to me, "Hey Dufus! I do everything with Rogers, and they give me 15% off all my bills. I love Rogers! YAAR!!". For those people, I would calculate what the additional 5% discount (from having a 3rd product with Rogers) amounts to. You'll still be better off switching to Teksavvy, buddy.
Conclusion
Well, the choice is yours. You can save 31% or $132 a year (pre-tax) by switching over to Teksavvy. Or if you're looking to increase your bandwidth, you can opt for the 300GB package and still save $60 each year or 14%. Make one phone call, and then sit back and watch the money rolling in! Well actually, you'll be watching your money stay in your wallet (just as exciting).
I've been with Teksavvy cable internet for the past 5+ years and have not had any issues. Recently, they have been restricting new customer activations in their highly congested areas, and have been trying to update their network to accommodate for this demand. If this is the case, I give you 4 alternatives: (1) switch to DSL (Teksavvy also offers this), (2) speak with
For those interested, here are the comparisons of the other internet packages offered by both companies:
I would love to meet the person who subscribes to the Rogers Ultimate package, with speeds of 75Mbps download and 2Mbps upload!!
Note: Other than being a customer, I am not affiliated with Teksavvy. My only allegiance is to my wallet. The above stats were based on Teksavvy and Rogers pricing in July 2012
Monday, July 30, 2012
Raspberry Pi
Our friends in the UK are off to a kick-ass 2012. They are host to the world at the Summer Olympics and so far they've kicked it off relatively smoothly, with the only major exception being Romney's slip (success!) and the slip on playing South Korea's national anthem in place of North Korea's (fail!). Some would consider that witch's, I mean her Majesty the Queen's entrance to be a success. But I will keep my differing opinion to myself.
So the jocks are taking up all the limelight AGAIN, huh? Well, let me tell you a thing or two. Well just one, but it's BIG! Actually it's quite small...
Introducing the Raspberry Pi:
It's a credit card sized single-board computer developed with the intention of stimulating the teaching of basic computer science in schools. It does this by having an affordable $35 price tag on it. And the kids are digging it - it's such a hot commodity that there is a 5 week waiting list to get their little hands on it. Check out what these "kids" have done with it:
I know you're wondering why a jock like me would be interested in this. Well here it is. This tiny computer can play full HD movies without a problem - a $35 solution for your home entertainment needs! Now if that's not something to get excited over, then go jump off a plane into the Olympic stadium. Despite the extraordinary graphics processor on this baby, it is currently limited in terms of the type of video it can handle (apparently does not do well with Flash or MPEG2). But it's a promising start, and a great option for those who don't care for such things. I can't wait until there's a <$50 HTPC option that can play anything, has adequate storage space for your meda, and includes a TV tuner. Absolute heaven.
So the jocks are taking up all the limelight AGAIN, huh? Well, let me tell you a thing or two. Well just one, but it's BIG! Actually it's quite small...
Introducing the Raspberry Pi:
It's a credit card sized single-board computer developed with the intention of stimulating the teaching of basic computer science in schools. It does this by having an affordable $35 price tag on it. And the kids are digging it - it's such a hot commodity that there is a 5 week waiting list to get their little hands on it. Check out what these "kids" have done with it:
I know you're wondering why a jock like me would be interested in this. Well here it is. This tiny computer can play full HD movies without a problem - a $35 solution for your home entertainment needs! Now if that's not something to get excited over, then go jump off a plane into the Olympic stadium. Despite the extraordinary graphics processor on this baby, it is currently limited in terms of the type of video it can handle (apparently does not do well with Flash or MPEG2). But it's a promising start, and a great option for those who don't care for such things. I can't wait until there's a <$50 HTPC option that can play anything, has adequate storage space for your meda, and includes a TV tuner. Absolute heaven.
Saturday, July 28, 2012
Cutting the cord
This one is a beast - I have thrown just about everything at it and it has far exceeded my expectations. It runs quietly and is highly customizable. I am so proud of her.
Selling my sweat and hard work on Kijiji: Want to cut your TV bill? Git it!
Selling my sweat and hard work on Kijiji: Want to cut your TV bill? Git it!
The case for... a Blog!
In today's economy, companies are finding it difficult to add top line growth and instead are cutting operating costs to stay competitive. Individuals are feeling the pinch too (due to corporate cost cutting) and are being pressured to do the same.
This blog will serve as a place to review humanoid operating costs and to share my encounters with minimizing these expenses without compromising our standard of living... because saving a loonie a day will pay for your annual Dom Perignon fix!
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)










